CICERO - Center for International Climate Research
NO
Meny
TOPICS
Energy Food and forests Climate finance Local Solutions China ​International Climate Policy The Arctic

The carbon budget for dummies.
Explained by

 

 

The cumulative emissions concept is beautiful! Given a goal of not exceeding 2°C, and how much we’ve already emitted, we can calculate the actual amount of CO2 – the ‘carbon budget’ – that we can emit in the future.

Starting today, we can emit no more than about 800 billion tonnes CO2 to have a likely chance to limit total human-induced warming to less than 2°C above the period 1861–1880.

A remaining carbon budget of 800 billion tonnes CO2 sounds big, but with current emissions levels of 40 billion tonnes CO2 per year, this remaining carbon budget will be entirely gone in just 20 years.

Time is short and we cannot use all known fossil fuel reserves.

glen peters

The remaining carbon budget is also more than four times larger than the estimated total fossil carbon reserves, with resources much larger. See the figure to the right, and learn.

The implications are clear: time is short and we cannot use all known fossil fuel reserves.

What about the remaining carbon budget for a reasonable chance to stay below 1.5°C? This is, after all, the aspirational ambition of Paris Agreement.

Give or take, the remaining carbon budget for 1.5°C is about 150 billion tonnes CO2. Given the lack of data, one should give this number appropriate uncertainty.

By 2020, we would have emitted enough carbon dioxide to push us over 1.5°C. Because of the inertia in the climate system, 1.5°C may come 10 years later. Whatever, that is just around the corner!

...emissions need to go to zero at an unprecedented rate

glen peters

Of course, the real world is not as simple and beautiful as the concept of a carbon budget might imply. There are complications, uncertainties, non-CO2 emissions, and many other quirks. Have a look at these blog posts, where it is explained more thoroughly.

Whether the remaining budget is 700, 800, or 900 billion tonnes CO2 is beside the point. The core message of the ‘carbon budget’ is that emissions need to go to zero at an unprecedented rate.

We have plenty of fossil reserves, but only a limited carbon budget.

 

 

 

More on global emissions and temperature change

Global CO2 emissions likely to rise in 2017

Global carbon dioxide emissions were almost flat for three years (2014-2016) bringing much needed optimism, but emissions are expected to increase in 2017.

How China has reduced the carbon footprint of developed countries

Commentary: We tend to remember the way things were, not the way things are.

COMMENTARY: Did 1.5°C suddenly get easier?

COMMENTARY: A new paper suggests a rather significant upward revision of the carbon budget for 1.5°C. This is a potential game changer, but it is too early to reformulate mitigation plans.

The policy vision to keep below 2°C warming

Can we trust emission statistics?

Many have reported that CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry are flat, but we have had a record increase in CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere. Yes, this is exactly what is expected!

0.5°C makes a big difference for mitigation

Keeping global warming below 2°C is hard, but 2.5°C is a walk in the park!

Well below 2C

The Paris Agreement calls to hold the increase in the global average temperature to “well below 2°C”. What on earth does that mean?

Does the carbon budget mean the end of fossil fuels?

No, Carbon Capture and Storage and Carbon Dioxide Removal allow the continued use of fossil fuels. But for how long? And what are the risks?

Should climate policy aim to avoid 2°C or to exceed 2°C?

There are different ways to define carbon budgets, and a particularly important distinction is between the two concepts of avoiding a temperature target and exceeding a temperature target. Understanding the difference between these two concepts goes a long way to explaining different types of budgets.

Global Environmental Footprints

COMMENT: In rich countries, the environmental footprint is growing while domestic environmental pressures are declining, most studies find. Should policy focus on consumption instead of production? 

Saving the planet with bioenergy, or not?

COMMENT: An old debate is back in the news. Yes, bioenergy. It will either save the planet or destroy the planet, but seemingly, never anything in between. Should we use bioenergy, or should we ban it?

How much carbon dioxide can we emit?

BLOG: Despite the complexity of the climate system, there is a rather simple relationship between the long-term temperature increase and the total amount of carbon dioxide emitted. Why, then, is there no clear answer to how much we can emit?

More posts